Editor's Note: The following is excerpted from Sam Collins' upcoming column. It applies to all providers who maintain digital health records.
The 21st Century Cures Act, which passed in 2016 but only recently underwent final regulatory rule-making (implementation of which was subsequently delayed until now due to the pandemic), is different from HIPAA because it mandates not just patient data access – which in some cases could start and end with a copy of one's health records – but also clinical notes. In essence, the Cures Act is putting into action widespread "OpenNotes," the health data philosophy that all patients should have access to the notes their clinicians take during health encounters.
This requirement is different from those indicated in the HIPAA Privacy Rule because it requires patients to have immediate access to their digital data, such as via a patient portal. The eight types of clinical notes that must be shared include consultation notes, discharge summary notes, history and physical exam notes, imaging narratives, laboratory report narratives, pathology report narratives, procedure notes and progress notes.
Under this new rule, clinical notes must be shared by health systems as of April 5, 2021, and shared with a patient's third-party application (app) that may be downloaded to a smartphone or other device by Oct. 6, 2022.
There are some exemptions to the rule, but by and large, all health care providers, health information exchanges and certified health IT developers must comply.
I assume most EHR vendors are aware of this rule, but as the holder of patient health information and records, it is your responsibility ultimately. Make no assumptions about your system and clarify how it will be able to comply. There is no acupuncture provider exception; if you maintain electronic health records, then it is your responsibility.
On April 1, 2026, China implemented a landmark national standard: Classification and Determination of TCM Constitution. Although designated as a recommended rather than mandatory standard, it represents a major step in modernizing traditional Chinese medicine (TCM) by converting traditional constitution theory into a clear, measurable and clinically practical framework. By clarifying the relationship between constitution, disease, and pattern differentiation, the standard strengthens professional credibility, supports research, and enhances patient-centered treatment.
The field of acupuncture in the U.S. continues to grow in visibility, patient demand and clinical effectiveness. Yet behind the curtain, many acupuncturists are quietly struggling to keep their doors open. While the profession is rooted in centuries of healing tradition, modern economic pressures – particularly those driven by insurance limitations, low reimbursement rates and job-market saturation – are making it increasingly difficult for licensed acupuncturists to thrive.
A student stands over a patient, needle poised. They have a “perfect” prescription: a textbook combination of points harvested from a lecture slide on chronic lower back pain. But as the needle meets the skin, the student hesitates - the symptom of a quiet habit that has taken hold of our profession. We routinely say we “prescribe” points. It sounds efficient. It echoes the authority of biomedical culture and fits neatly into the insurance field. But vocabulary is never neutral; repeated long enough, it dictates behavior.
