On Sept. 24, 2024, the Accreditation Commission for Acupuncture and Herbal Medicine (ACAHM) published a Call for Public Comment on its website regarding entry-level doctoral degree completion tracks. The commission proposes ending the doctoral completion track option. Entry-level doctoral degree completion tracks would no longer be an option for ACAHM-accredited programs after Jan. 1, 2030.
It is common sense that our profession should follow the same path physical therapists and other professions have accomplished, accepting a professional doctorate degree as an entry-level requirement. Yes, it is well-understood that the integrity of the entry-level doctoral degree should be strengthened. However, it should be done in a sensible and considerate way for the profession and the acupuncture colleges.
Currently, roughly half of U.S. acupuncture colleges offer entry-level doctorate degrees. According to some acupuncture colleges’ feedback, it takes about 10 years to institute and accredit the entry-level doctorate track. That means colleges that do not have established entry-level doctorate programs will continue to enroll students in master’s degrees at minimum until 2034 while they are working on upbringing entry-level doctorate programs.
If the ACAHM eliminates the completion track in 2030, how will it affect colleges? Will they be losing students to other colleges who were planning to take a completion track upon graduation, which will no longer be an option? It seems to be devastating politics for our colleges that already have financial hardship.
This situation also raises questions for acupuncturists with master’s degrees who do not have the financial opportunity to accomplish the completion track before 2030; or who graduate with master’s degrees past the 2030-year mark – what future perspective will they have?
Will they be left behind with only a master’s degree, which will hinder employment options? Or will they be compelled to enroll in four years of an entry-level doctorate from the start? That does not make sense, period! Or will they be forced to pursue 1,200 hours of mixed online/in-person advanced doctorate instead of 300 purely online entry-level doctorate for half the price for direct costs? Not to mention that subjects studied at the completion track and advanced doctorates are entirely different.
Would it make common sense to help all acupuncture colleges to offer entry-level doctorates first while gradually discontinuing offering a master's degree and only then contemplating discontinuation of the completion track? Especially since it is not a separate program; it is just a compilation of classes that differentiate a master’s degree from a doctorate degree. Therefore, a slowdown in current enrollment into a completion tract cannot justify discontinuing the completion track because those classes are taught as a part of an entry-level doctorate anyway!
To conclude, will the elimination of the entry-level doctoral degree completion track hinge on the advancement of our master’s degree graduates, precluding them from employment in the future and defeating the success of the profession at large? The discontinuation of the completion track in 2030 seems to be severely premature.
Should ACAHM organize a town hall for the profession to explain their thoughts about the proposal to end an entry-level doctorate completion track and discuss our concerns before making harsh decisions?
What is your opinion? Tell it to the ACAHM here. The deadline for public comments is Oct. 24, 2024. Act NOW!
Structured water (H3O2) can be considered a fourth state of water between liquid and solid. It has the hexagonal structure of ice; however, missing a critical bond, it behaves more like a gel than a solid, but retains some of its crystalline structure.
In the past five years of my clinical practice, I have seen an astonishing upsurge in the chronic use of proton-pump inhibitor (PPI) medications for the gastrointestinal issue diagnosed by allopathic medicine as GERD. It is not uncommon to encounter patients taking these prescriptions for five-plus years.
Working with chronically ill patients entails acknowledging the reality that not all patients will survive their diagnosis. Chinese medicine and acupuncture play a crucial role in palliative and end-of-life care, addressing medication and disease side effects, alleviating pain associated with death, reducing anxiety and stress, and helping patients find peace during the dying process.
